https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383023 In fiscal matters, where the assessing authority has considered the inspection, notice, reply, personal hearing and the dealer's materials, and the dispute concerns the factual basis for a reduced demand, writ jurisdiction under Article 226 should ordinarily not be invoked. The Court held that the petitioner had an efficacious statutory appeal under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, and the grievance was fit for appellate review rather than writ scrutiny. No violation of the JKM Graphics principle was made out on the facts, so the writ petition was not entertained and the petitioner was relegated to the statutory appellate remedy. en-us Tue, 02 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Jul 2019 07:57:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383023 In fiscal matters, where the assessing authority has considered the inspection, notice, reply, personal hearing and the dealer's materials, and the dispute concerns the factual basis for a reduced demand, writ jurisdiction under Article 226 should ordinarily not be invoked. The Court held that the petitioner had an efficacious statutory appeal under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, and the grievance was fit for appellate review rather than writ scrutiny. No violation of the JKM Graphics principle was made out on the facts, so the writ petition was not entertained and the petitioner was relegated to the statutory appellate remedy. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 02 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383023