https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383022 In fiscal matters, writ jurisdiction will ordinarily not be exercised where an efficacious statutory appeal is available, unless the case falls within a recognised exception such as lack of jurisdiction, breach of natural justice, or an ineffective remedy. The Madras HC held that challenge to revised assessments under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 could not bypass the appellate mechanism because notice had been issued and the dealer's reply considered, and the grievance was essentially against the correctness of the assessment. The writ petitions were therefore not maintainable, and the petitioner was relegated to the statutory appeal remedy. en-us Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Jul 2019 07:56:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383022 In fiscal matters, writ jurisdiction will ordinarily not be exercised where an efficacious statutory appeal is available, unless the case falls within a recognised exception such as lack of jurisdiction, breach of natural justice, or an ineffective remedy. The Madras HC held that challenge to revised assessments under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 could not bypass the appellate mechanism because notice had been issued and the dealer's reply considered, and the grievance was essentially against the correctness of the assessment. The writ petitions were therefore not maintainable, and the petitioner was relegated to the statutory appeal remedy. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383022