https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383016 The Court set aside the first respondent's order and remitted the matter for reconsideration and disposal under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act within eight weeks. The judgment clarified that the first respondent had jurisdiction to revise orders despite the involvement of the Centralized Processing Centre, emphasizing the authority to act on the petitioner's request in accordance with the law. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly. en-us Wed, 12 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Jul 2019 07:46:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383016 The Court set aside the first respondent's order and remitted the matter for reconsideration and disposal under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act within eight weeks. The judgment clarified that the first respondent had jurisdiction to revise orders despite the involvement of the Centralized Processing Centre, emphasizing the authority to act on the petitioner's request in accordance with the law. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 12 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383016