https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281974 The Tribunal found the Respondents at fault for not obeying the directions of the Company Law Board, emphasizing that the mere filing of an appeal does not automatically suspend the implementation of the Order unless a stay has been specifically granted by the higher court. The Tribunal directed the Respondents to pay costs to the Applicant, provide requested documents, refrain from alienating assets without notice, and comply promptly with the directions to prevent future non-compliance. en-us Fri, 20 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Jul 2019 07:43:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281974 The Tribunal found the Respondents at fault for not obeying the directions of the Company Law Board, emphasizing that the mere filing of an appeal does not automatically suspend the implementation of the Order unless a stay has been specifically granted by the higher court. The Tribunal directed the Respondents to pay costs to the Applicant, provide requested documents, refrain from alienating assets without notice, and comply promptly with the directions to prevent future non-compliance. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 20 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281974