<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1694 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281980</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, deleting the disallowance under section 14A r.w.r. 8D as the Assessing Officer had not expressed dissatisfaction with the disallowance made by the assessee. The Departmental Representative did not contest this decision, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal as it became irrelevant. The judgment was pronounced on October 17, 2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2019 07:43:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1694 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281980</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, deleting the disallowance under section 14A r.w.r. 8D as the Assessing Officer had not expressed dissatisfaction with the disallowance made by the assessee. The Departmental Representative did not contest this decision, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal as it became irrelevant. The judgment was pronounced on October 17, 2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281980</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>