https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18942 The High Court allowed the revisional application, setting aside the Tribunal's order and remanding the miscellaneous applications for reconsideration. The Court emphasized the importance of conscientious procedure in affirming admissions and found the Tribunal's decision resulted in a miscarriage of justice. The Court addressed technical objections raised by the Department, granting relief under section 254(2) and exercising supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 to prevent potential injustice. The judgment concluded by directing the Tribunal to record findings on the alleged admission while leaving other points open for further legal recourse, with no order as to costs. en-us Fri, 24 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:14:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18942 The High Court allowed the revisional application, setting aside the Tribunal's order and remanding the miscellaneous applications for reconsideration. The Court emphasized the importance of conscientious procedure in affirming admissions and found the Tribunal's decision resulted in a miscarriage of justice. The Court addressed technical objections raised by the Department, granting relief under section 254(2) and exercising supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 to prevent potential injustice. The judgment concluded by directing the Tribunal to record findings on the alleged admission while leaving other points open for further legal recourse, with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 24 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18942