https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281964 Supervisory employment under Section 3(13) of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act requires control over persons working under the employee, and mere oversight of plant, machinery or work processes is insufficient. Technical employment requires specialised knowledge, training, experience, judgment or skill applied to the work itself, and not merely routine or repetitive tasks; occasional testing of materials or checking recruits does not by itself make the work technical. On the evidence, the employee was found neither supervisory nor technical, so he remained within the statutory definition of "employee", and the challenge to reinstatement and back wages failed. en-us Mon, 19 Jun 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Jul 2019 11:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281964 Supervisory employment under Section 3(13) of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act requires control over persons working under the employee, and mere oversight of plant, machinery or work processes is insufficient. Technical employment requires specialised knowledge, training, experience, judgment or skill applied to the work itself, and not merely routine or repetitive tasks; occasional testing of materials or checking recruits does not by itself make the work technical. On the evidence, the employee was found neither supervisory nor technical, so he remained within the statutory definition of "employee", and the challenge to reinstatement and back wages failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 19 Jun 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281964