<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 709 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383013</link>
    <description>Delay in re-filing the appeal was condoned due to reasons provided. The addition of a capitation fee to the Assessee&#039;s income for Assessment Year 2013-14 was upheld under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act. Appeals by the Assessee before CIT(A) and ITAT were dismissed as no credible explanation for the fee was provided. The Court found no legal error in ITAT&#039;s decision, affirming the addition of the fee to the Assessee&#039;s income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 709 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383013</link>
      <description>Delay in re-filing the appeal was condoned due to reasons provided. The addition of a capitation fee to the Assessee&#039;s income for Assessment Year 2013-14 was upheld under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act. Appeals by the Assessee before CIT(A) and ITAT were dismissed as no credible explanation for the fee was provided. The Court found no legal error in ITAT&#039;s decision, affirming the addition of the fee to the Assessee&#039;s income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>