https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18935 A tax informer's claim for reward involved disputed facts and was not suitable for adjudication under Article 226. The absence of a response to representations did not, by itself, create an enforceable right to the reward. As the controversy required factual determination, the writ petition was not entertainable, and any remedy lay in civil proceedings by way of a suit. No relief was granted. en-us Wed, 12 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18935 A tax informer's claim for reward involved disputed facts and was not suitable for adjudication under Article 226. The absence of a response to representations did not, by itself, create an enforceable right to the reward. As the controversy required factual determination, the writ petition was not entertainable, and any remedy lay in civil proceedings by way of a suit. No relief was granted. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 12 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18935