<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (9) TMI 58 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18934</link>
    <description>A composition fee paid to a Cantonment Board for regularising building activity was treated as an admissible deduction in computing income from house property under section 24(1)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court noted that payment of a composition fee does not, by itself, mean the payer has accepted illegality, and on the facts the expenditure was connected with the property. The deduction was therefore upheld and the issue was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:42:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (9) TMI 58 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18934</link>
      <description>A composition fee paid to a Cantonment Board for regularising building activity was treated as an admissible deduction in computing income from house property under section 24(1)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court noted that payment of a composition fee does not, by itself, mean the payer has accepted illegality, and on the facts the expenditure was connected with the property. The deduction was therefore upheld and the issue was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>