<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 683 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382987</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the Commissioner&#039;s rejection of the remission application, directing reconsideration due to goods being non-marketable under a court order. The Tribunal criticized assumptions of malafide intentions and interference with business decisions, emphasizing the legitimacy of the remission claim. The High Court directed notice issuance against the show cause notice instead of reconsidering the remission application, with further proceedings as per Para 8(B).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2019 07:06:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 683 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382987</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the Commissioner&#039;s rejection of the remission application, directing reconsideration due to goods being non-marketable under a court order. The Tribunal criticized assumptions of malafide intentions and interference with business decisions, emphasizing the legitimacy of the remission claim. The High Court directed notice issuance against the show cause notice instead of reconsidering the remission application, with further proceedings as per Para 8(B).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382987</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>