<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 681 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382985</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, overturning the denial of CENVAT credits on General Insurance Services, Works Contracts Services, and Motor Car Services. It held that transit insurance for export goods, repair and renovation services, and motor car services for a vehicle considered a capital good were admissible. The decision was based on legal interpretations, precedents, and the specific circumstances of the case, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2019 07:05:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 681 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382985</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, overturning the denial of CENVAT credits on General Insurance Services, Works Contracts Services, and Motor Car Services. It held that transit insurance for export goods, repair and renovation services, and motor car services for a vehicle considered a capital good were admissible. The decision was based on legal interpretations, precedents, and the specific circumstances of the case, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382985</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>