<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1830 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281953</link>
    <description>A joint venture formed only to secure a contract was not taxable as an Association of Persons where the supplementary agreement showed that one constituent alone bore the financial risk, executed the project, provided resources, operated the joint bank account, complied with statutory requirements, and remained solely responsible for profits and losses. On those facts, the joint venture agreement was treated as a bidding arrangement rather than a genuine taxable joint activity, and the CBDT circular supported that approach. The contract income was therefore not assessable in the hands of the joint venture, and the addition made on that basis was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Jul 2019 15:54:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1830 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281953</link>
      <description>A joint venture formed only to secure a contract was not taxable as an Association of Persons where the supplementary agreement showed that one constituent alone bore the financial risk, executed the project, provided resources, operated the joint bank account, complied with statutory requirements, and remained solely responsible for profits and losses. On those facts, the joint venture agreement was treated as a bidding arrangement rather than a genuine taxable joint activity, and the CBDT circular supported that approach. The contract income was therefore not assessable in the hands of the joint venture, and the addition made on that basis was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>