<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 645 - ATFEMA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281951</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside. The case was remanded for fresh adjudication with specific instructions for the Adjudicating Officer to consider all relevant evidence and legal positions comprehensively. The appellant was directed to file a compilation of RBI&#039;s write-off permissions and related evidence before the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2019 10:58:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 645 - ATFEMA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281951</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside. The case was remanded for fresh adjudication with specific instructions for the Adjudicating Officer to consider all relevant evidence and legal positions comprehensively. The appellant was directed to file a compilation of RBI&#039;s write-off permissions and related evidence before the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>