https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281946 The Court upheld the validity of the impugned notification and the prescribed rebate for binding material under the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966. It found the exercise of power by the Central and State Governments lawful, the rebate reasonable, and the trade restriction justified in the public interest. The petitions challenging the notification were dismissed with costs. en-us Wed, 03 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Jul 2019 10:19:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281946 The Court upheld the validity of the impugned notification and the prescribed rebate for binding material under the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966. It found the exercise of power by the Central and State Governments lawful, the rebate reasonable, and the trade restriction justified in the public interest. The petitions challenging the notification were dismissed with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 03 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281946