https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382983 The Court disposed of the writ petition challenging the detention order under Section 129 (1) of the KGST Act, 2017, and notice under Section 129 (3) of the Act. It directed the petitioner to submit a bank guarantee for tax and penalty for the release of the detained goods within a specified timeframe. The respondent was ordered to release the goods and complete the enquiry process within defined timelines, with the petitioner not obliged to maintain the bank guarantee beyond a specified period if the timelines were not met. en-us Thu, 11 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Jul 2019 08:08:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382983 The Court disposed of the writ petition challenging the detention order under Section 129 (1) of the KGST Act, 2017, and notice under Section 129 (3) of the Act. It directed the petitioner to submit a bank guarantee for tax and penalty for the release of the detained goods within a specified timeframe. The respondent was ordered to release the goods and complete the enquiry process within defined timelines, with the petitioner not obliged to maintain the bank guarantee beyond a specified period if the timelines were not met. Case-Laws GST Thu, 11 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382983