<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 655 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382959</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal in ITA No.377/PUN/2014 and allowed the appeal in ITA No.378/PUN/2014 for statistical purposes. Various transfer pricing issues were remitted back to the Assessing Officer to apply legal propositions and consider Advance Pricing Agreements under the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal directed the exclusion and inclusion of specific comparable companies in different segments, emphasized the consideration of contemporaneous data, allowed a risk adjustment following a specific precedent, dismissed the interest levy issue as consequential, and deemed the penalty proceedings premature. The Assessing Officer was instructed to re-examine and decide the matters in line with the Tribunal&#039;s directions and relevant APAs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 13:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 655 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382959</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal in ITA No.377/PUN/2014 and allowed the appeal in ITA No.378/PUN/2014 for statistical purposes. Various transfer pricing issues were remitted back to the Assessing Officer to apply legal propositions and consider Advance Pricing Agreements under the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal directed the exclusion and inclusion of specific comparable companies in different segments, emphasized the consideration of contemporaneous data, allowed a risk adjustment following a specific precedent, dismissed the interest levy issue as consequential, and deemed the penalty proceedings premature. The Assessing Officer was instructed to re-examine and decide the matters in line with the Tribunal&#039;s directions and relevant APAs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>