https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18922 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding the notice under section 147 and subsequent orders to be without jurisdiction. The court emphasized that the Assessing Officer failed to address the petitioner's objections and issued notices erroneously. Additionally, the court held that assessments beyond the permissible period were invalid, leading to the quashing of all notices and orders, with directions for the refund of any security deposited by the petitioner. en-us Thu, 05 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:59:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18922 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding the notice under section 147 and subsequent orders to be without jurisdiction. The court emphasized that the Assessing Officer failed to address the petitioner's objections and issued notices erroneously. Additionally, the court held that assessments beyond the permissible period were invalid, leading to the quashing of all notices and orders, with directions for the refund of any security deposited by the petitioner. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 05 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18922