<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 650 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382954</link>
    <description>The court directed the second respondent to promptly dispose of delay condonation and stay petitions within two months. Coercive steps for recovery were prohibited for ten weeks, allowing the petitioner to transfer 20% of the penalty amount. A stay was granted on the bank attachment notice during this period to facilitate the transfer without hindrance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 16:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 650 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382954</link>
      <description>The court directed the second respondent to promptly dispose of delay condonation and stay petitions within two months. Coercive steps for recovery were prohibited for ten weeks, allowing the petitioner to transfer 20% of the penalty amount. A stay was granted on the bank attachment notice during this period to facilitate the transfer without hindrance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>