<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 628 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382932</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside penalties but upholding the demand for wrongly availed Cenvat credit. The judgment highlighted the significance of legal advice in tax matters and clarified that simultaneous benefits like Cenvat credit and drawback are not permissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2019 07:48:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 628 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382932</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside penalties but upholding the demand for wrongly availed Cenvat credit. The judgment highlighted the significance of legal advice in tax matters and clarified that simultaneous benefits like Cenvat credit and drawback are not permissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>