<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 626 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382930</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to the Exemption Notification No. 67/95-CE even before the amendment by Notification No. 31/2001-CE. The Tribunal clarified that the Commissioner could address issues like reversal of credit beyond the remand order, leading to the allowance of the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The decision was based on legal interpretations, precedents, and specific provisions of relevant notifications and acts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2019 07:48:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 626 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382930</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to the Exemption Notification No. 67/95-CE even before the amendment by Notification No. 31/2001-CE. The Tribunal clarified that the Commissioner could address issues like reversal of credit beyond the remand order, leading to the allowance of the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The decision was based on legal interpretations, precedents, and specific provisions of relevant notifications and acts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>