https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382928 The court set aside Ext.P5 and remitted the matter back to the first respondent for reconsideration. The court directed the first respondent to provide necessary details and opportunities to the petitioner for filing reconciliation statements or evidence related to inter-State purchases. The decision aimed to address procedural irregularities and ensure compliance with legal requirements and procedural fairness in the rectification process under the KVAT Act. en-us Fri, 05 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Dec 2019 14:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382928 The court set aside Ext.P5 and remitted the matter back to the first respondent for reconsideration. The court directed the first respondent to provide necessary details and opportunities to the petitioner for filing reconciliation statements or evidence related to inter-State purchases. The decision aimed to address procedural irregularities and ensure compliance with legal requirements and procedural fairness in the rectification process under the KVAT Act. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 05 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382928