<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1447 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281937</link>
    <description>Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act creates a deemed month-to-month tenancy for non-agricultural and non-manufacturing use unless there is a valid contract to the contrary, and termination requires fifteen days&#039; notice. An unregistered lease deed may be used to prove the existence of tenancy, but it cannot be relied on to contract out of the statutory notice requirement where section 107 makes registration necessary for the relevant class of leases. On that basis, the unregistered agreement could not displace section 106, the notice of termination remained valid, and the remand directed by the High Court was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 18:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1447 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281937</link>
      <description>Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act creates a deemed month-to-month tenancy for non-agricultural and non-manufacturing use unless there is a valid contract to the contrary, and termination requires fifteen days&#039; notice. An unregistered lease deed may be used to prove the existence of tenancy, but it cannot be relied on to contract out of the statutory notice requirement where section 107 makes registration necessary for the relevant class of leases. On that basis, the unregistered agreement could not displace section 106, the notice of termination remained valid, and the remand directed by the High Court was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>