<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1645 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281942</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of benefit under Section 11 of the Act, as the assessee&#039;s activities were considered commercial rather than charitable. The Tribunal found that the trading activities lacked charitable intent, leading to substantial profits. The decision was based on the proviso to Section 2(15) of the Act, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2019 07:31:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1645 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281942</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of benefit under Section 11 of the Act, as the assessee&#039;s activities were considered commercial rather than charitable. The Tribunal found that the trading activities lacked charitable intent, leading to substantial profits. The decision was based on the proviso to Section 2(15) of the Act, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>