<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>E-PROCEEDINGS OF APPEAL - MOCKERY EVEN AT LEVEL OF COMMISSIONER JUST TO DISMISS APPEAL IN ANY MANNER TO HARASS ASSESSEE – Why action is not taken against Erring officers? Will NAMO 2 government curtail power to harass public?</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8613</link>
    <description>The article alleges that a Commissioner (Appeals) dismissed an appeal for non-prosecution despite the appellant having uploaded multiple submissions, attachments and adjournment requests in the department&#039;s e proceeding portal and sending copies by email; the CIT(A) recorded service of notices and non appearance, did not examine assessment records or decide on merits, and closed the e proceeding without addressing the on record submissions, prompting questions about officer accountability and procedural fairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2019 07:11:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 15:58:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>E-PROCEEDINGS OF APPEAL - MOCKERY EVEN AT LEVEL OF COMMISSIONER JUST TO DISMISS APPEAL IN ANY MANNER TO HARASS ASSESSEE – Why action is not taken against Erring officers? Will NAMO 2 government curtail power to harass public?</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8613</link>
      <description>The article alleges that a Commissioner (Appeals) dismissed an appeal for non-prosecution despite the appellant having uploaded multiple submissions, attachments and adjournment requests in the department&#039;s e proceeding portal and sending copies by email; the CIT(A) recorded service of notices and non appearance, did not examine assessment records or decide on merits, and closed the e proceeding without addressing the on record submissions, prompting questions about officer accountability and procedural fairness.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2019 07:11:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>