<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 1313 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281919</link>
    <description>Questions concerning tax treatment of compensation for compulsory acquisition of agricultural land, the character of such land as stock-in-trade or capital asset, assessability of income from part of a property under the head &quot;Property&quot;, related repair and depreciation claims, and taxability of profit on sale of agricultural lands were addressed by applying the Delhi High Court&#039;s earlier decision in the assessee&#039;s own case on materially identical facts. The reference was disposed of by following that precedent. The question on profit from sale of agricultural lands was treated as closely linked to the character of the land and became academic, so it was not separately answered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 18:18:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 1313 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281919</link>
      <description>Questions concerning tax treatment of compensation for compulsory acquisition of agricultural land, the character of such land as stock-in-trade or capital asset, assessability of income from part of a property under the head &quot;Property&quot;, related repair and depreciation claims, and taxability of profit on sale of agricultural lands were addressed by applying the Delhi High Court&#039;s earlier decision in the assessee&#039;s own case on materially identical facts. The reference was disposed of by following that precedent. The question on profit from sale of agricultural lands was treated as closely linked to the character of the land and became academic, so it was not separately answered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>