https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281916 Land acquired for a tourism development project was characterised as acquisition under Section 40(1)(aa) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, not Section 40(1)(b). The statutory agreement preserved an existing public pathway to the beach through survey No. 803, and that access remained enforceable despite vesting in the State under Section 16. Construction on a portion of survey No. 803 breached the agreement's prohibition on unauthorised building activity and was liable to demolition notwithstanding later planning approvals. The created facilities were not required to be opened to the general public free of cost, as the agreement contemplated use on membership or permitted-use terms. en-us Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Jul 2019 13:28:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281916 Land acquired for a tourism development project was characterised as acquisition under Section 40(1)(aa) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, not Section 40(1)(b). The statutory agreement preserved an existing public pathway to the beach through survey No. 803, and that access remained enforceable despite vesting in the State under Section 16. Construction on a portion of survey No. 803 breached the agreement's prohibition on unauthorised building activity and was liable to demolition notwithstanding later planning approvals. The created facilities were not required to be opened to the general public free of cost, as the agreement contemplated use on membership or permitted-use terms. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281916