https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18902 The court dismissed the petition, ruling that interest on the deposit made with the Tax Recovery Officer should be calculated from February 17, 1989, instead of July 6, 1987. The court found no error in the department's decision to appropriate the amount towards the deceased partner's tax arrears from the later date. The petitioner's argument for interest calculation from the date of deposit was rejected, and the court held that there was no jurisdiction to intervene under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs, and the department's position on interest calculation was upheld. en-us Wed, 15 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:39:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18902 The court dismissed the petition, ruling that interest on the deposit made with the Tax Recovery Officer should be calculated from February 17, 1989, instead of July 6, 1987. The court found no error in the department's decision to appropriate the amount towards the deceased partner's tax arrears from the later date. The petitioner's argument for interest calculation from the date of deposit was rejected, and the court held that there was no jurisdiction to intervene under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs, and the department's position on interest calculation was upheld. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 15 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18902