<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 590 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382894</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, requiring the appellant to reverse credits for certain periods and lost Consumer Premises Equipment (CPEs) with interest. The demand for reversal of credits for deactivated CPEs was set aside. Penalties were not imposed due to the absence of fraudulent intent or suppression of facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2019 18:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 590 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382894</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, requiring the appellant to reverse credits for certain periods and lost Consumer Premises Equipment (CPEs) with interest. The demand for reversal of credits for deactivated CPEs was set aside. Penalties were not imposed due to the absence of fraudulent intent or suppression of facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382894</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>