<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (12) TMI 11 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18901</link>
    <description>The High Court held in favor of the assessee regarding the classification of tube-well, plumbing, drainage, cable laying, and installation work as plant and machinery, entitling them to development rebate. However, the reclassification of furniture and fixtures as plant and machinery was denied, as these items were deemed part of the premises and not qualifying as plant. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision on this matter. The reference was disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:37:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (12) TMI 11 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18901</link>
      <description>The High Court held in favor of the assessee regarding the classification of tube-well, plumbing, drainage, cable laying, and installation work as plant and machinery, entitling them to development rebate. However, the reclassification of furniture and fixtures as plant and machinery was denied, as these items were deemed part of the premises and not qualifying as plant. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision on this matter. The reference was disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>