<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 573 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382877</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the refund claims for service tax paid under protest to proceed if the services provided were classified as works contract. The case was remanded to the Original Adjudicating Authority for further review of the contracts and certificates presented by the appellant to determine the nature of the services provided. The appellant was granted the opportunity to present their case for consideration, with the Tribunal finding that the duty payment under protest prevented the refund claim from being time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 12:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 573 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382877</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the refund claims for service tax paid under protest to proceed if the services provided were classified as works contract. The case was remanded to the Original Adjudicating Authority for further review of the contracts and certificates presented by the appellant to determine the nature of the services provided. The appellant was granted the opportunity to present their case for consideration, with the Tribunal finding that the duty payment under protest prevented the refund claim from being time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>