<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 570 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382874</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s liability for service tax and interest on renting immovable property, as acknowledged by the appellant. However, it set aside all penalties, including those under Section 78, citing confusion resolved by a retrospective amendment in the Finance Act, 2010. The Tribunal applied Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, granting a waiver of penalties due to legal developments. The appeal was allowed, maintaining the service tax and interest obligations but waiving all penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 17:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 570 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382874</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s liability for service tax and interest on renting immovable property, as acknowledged by the appellant. However, it set aside all penalties, including those under Section 78, citing confusion resolved by a retrospective amendment in the Finance Act, 2010. The Tribunal applied Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, granting a waiver of penalties due to legal developments. The appeal was allowed, maintaining the service tax and interest obligations but waiving all penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>