<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1445 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281900</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the surplus earned by the assessee society from its trading activities was liable to be taxed under the proviso to section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act. The appeals of the Revenue were allowed, and the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 06:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1445 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281900</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the surplus earned by the assessee society from its trading activities was liable to be taxed under the proviso to section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act. The appeals of the Revenue were allowed, and the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>