https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281906 The earlier constitutional invalidation of Section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 had removed the twin bail conditions, and the later amendment inserting the words "under this Act" did not expressly revive that regime or operate retrospectively. Bail therefore fell to be considered under the ordinary jurisdiction under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The applicant was also similarly placed to the principal accused, who had already been granted bail, and the other accused persons had likewise been enlarged on bail, supporting release on bail. en-us Wed, 06 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Jul 2019 06:36:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281906 The earlier constitutional invalidation of Section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 had removed the twin bail conditions, and the later amendment inserting the words "under this Act" did not expressly revive that regime or operate retrospectively. Bail therefore fell to be considered under the ordinary jurisdiction under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The applicant was also similarly placed to the principal accused, who had already been granted bail, and the other accused persons had likewise been enlarged on bail, supporting release on bail. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 06 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281906