<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1722 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281910</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal directing the Assessing Officer to restrict the disallowance to 5% of the purchase amount. The Tribunal found that the purchases were genuine but recommended limiting the disallowance to the profit margin embedded in the transactions. Other grounds raised by the appellant were dismissed or considered consequential. The order was issued on 29th April 2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 06:36:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578952" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1722 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281910</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal directing the Assessing Officer to restrict the disallowance to 5% of the purchase amount. The Tribunal found that the purchases were genuine but recommended limiting the disallowance to the profit margin embedded in the transactions. Other grounds raised by the appellant were dismissed or considered consequential. The order was issued on 29th April 2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>