<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 549 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382853</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Assessing Officer must independently decide on refund issuance without being constrained by a notice under Section 143(2). Emphasizing that CBDT instructions should not prejudice the assessee, the court directed the Respondents to process the return under Section 143(1) and release the refund with statutory interest within one month, disposing of the writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2020 16:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 549 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382853</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Assessing Officer must independently decide on refund issuance without being constrained by a notice under Section 143(2). Emphasizing that CBDT instructions should not prejudice the assessee, the court directed the Respondents to process the return under Section 143(1) and release the refund with statutory interest within one month, disposing of the writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>