<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 544 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382848</link>
    <description>The Court held that the notice issued under Section 148 to the deceased was invalid. The legal representative did not waive the need for a valid notice and objected to the proceedings. Therefore, Section 292B could not rectify this defect. The notice and all subsequent proceedings were annulled, and the writ application was granted with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 544 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382848</link>
      <description>The Court held that the notice issued under Section 148 to the deceased was invalid. The legal representative did not waive the need for a valid notice and objected to the proceedings. Therefore, Section 292B could not rectify this defect. The notice and all subsequent proceedings were annulled, and the writ application was granted with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>