<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant&#039;s Illegal Gratification Charge u/s 69 Dismissed; No Evidence Found Beyond Report and FIR.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=47859</link>
    <description>Addition u/s 69 of Illegal gratification paid by the assessee - said accusation against the Appellant was purely and solely based on the Shunglu Committee Report, FIR lodged by the CBI - addition u/s 69 is without any evidence of incurring such expenses, cannot sustain.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2019 06:41:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2019 06:36:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant&#039;s Illegal Gratification Charge u/s 69 Dismissed; No Evidence Found Beyond Report and FIR.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=47859</link>
      <description>Addition u/s 69 of Illegal gratification paid by the assessee - said accusation against the Appellant was purely and solely based on the Shunglu Committee Report, FIR lodged by the CBI - addition u/s 69 is without any evidence of incurring such expenses, cannot sustain.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2019 06:41:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=47859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>