<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 521 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382825</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the absence of consideration for interconnection usage for SMS provided by the Appellant meant no taxable service was rendered. The point of taxation did not occur due to the lack of an agreed price, and the extended period of limitation for issuing the show cause notice was deemed improper. The impugned order was set aside, and the Appellant was entitled to consequential benefits as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 13:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 521 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382825</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the absence of consideration for interconnection usage for SMS provided by the Appellant meant no taxable service was rendered. The point of taxation did not occur due to the lack of an agreed price, and the extended period of limitation for issuing the show cause notice was deemed improper. The impugned order was set aside, and the Appellant was entitled to consequential benefits as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>