<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 517 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382821</link>
    <description>Imported goods were found, as a matter of fact, to be blankets, and that factual finding supported classification under Chapter Heading 63014000. The SC held that no legal error or merit was shown to disturb the Tribunal&#039;s classification, and it therefore upheld the tariff classification. The challenge failed because, where goods answer the description in the relevant heading on the facts, the resulting classification will not be interfered with absent legal error.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2019 06:15:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 517 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382821</link>
      <description>Imported goods were found, as a matter of fact, to be blankets, and that factual finding supported classification under Chapter Heading 63014000. The SC held that no legal error or merit was shown to disturb the Tribunal&#039;s classification, and it therefore upheld the tariff classification. The challenge failed because, where goods answer the description in the relevant heading on the facts, the resulting classification will not be interfered with absent legal error.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>