<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 516 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382820</link>
    <description>Under Section 130-E(b) of the Customs Act, the Supreme Court reiterated that interference with the Tribunal&#039;s order is warranted only where a legal infirmity is shown. Finding none on the grounds advanced, the Court declined to disturb the impugned judgment and dismissed the appeals. Delay was condoned, but that procedural step did not alter the merits-based conclusion that no statutory basis for interference existed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2023 18:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 516 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382820</link>
      <description>Under Section 130-E(b) of the Customs Act, the Supreme Court reiterated that interference with the Tribunal&#039;s order is warranted only where a legal infirmity is shown. Finding none on the grounds advanced, the Court declined to disturb the impugned judgment and dismissed the appeals. Delay was condoned, but that procedural step did not alter the merits-based conclusion that no statutory basis for interference existed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>