<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 513 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382817</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s rejection of an appeal regarding the extension of the Export obligation period (EOP) under the EPCG Scheme due to non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement. The Tribunal directed a re-consideration by the Commissioner (Appeals) in light of the extension granted by the DGFT, emphasizing a fair and comprehensive review within three months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2019 06:15:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 513 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382817</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s rejection of an appeal regarding the extension of the Export obligation period (EOP) under the EPCG Scheme due to non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement. The Tribunal directed a re-consideration by the Commissioner (Appeals) in light of the extension granted by the DGFT, emphasizing a fair and comprehensive review within three months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>