<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 499 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382803</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s appeal for interest on a refund under Section 11 BB of the Central Excise Act in the context of a service tax refund claim by an exporter. The denial was based on the application of Condition No. 2(j) of Notification no.17/2009, despite the claim being filed within the stipulated period, and the absence of delay in granting the refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 17:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 499 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382803</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s appeal for interest on a refund under Section 11 BB of the Central Excise Act in the context of a service tax refund claim by an exporter. The denial was based on the application of Condition No. 2(j) of Notification no.17/2009, despite the claim being filed within the stipulated period, and the absence of delay in granting the refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>