<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 490 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382794</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Appeal, setting aside the Order disallowing cenvat credit for post-manufacturing activities. Relying on precedent, the Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to claim credit on commission payments to selling agents. The decision emphasized the need for independent interpretation in cases with conflicting precedents, ensuring the appellant&#039;s entitlement to the credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2019 06:13:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 490 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382794</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Appeal, setting aside the Order disallowing cenvat credit for post-manufacturing activities. Relying on precedent, the Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to claim credit on commission payments to selling agents. The decision emphasized the need for independent interpretation in cases with conflicting precedents, ensuring the appellant&#039;s entitlement to the credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>