<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 487 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382791</link>
    <description>Condensate emerging during natural gas processing was held outside the levy of oil cess and allied duties because it is not crude oil within the scope of the charging provision under Section 15 of the Oil Industry (Development) Act, 1974. The Tribunal followed its earlier ruling in the assessee&#039;s own case and treated the by-product as not covered by implication. It also accepted the limitation objection, noting that the demand was raised without invocation of the extended period and was therefore time barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2019 06:12:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 487 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382791</link>
      <description>Condensate emerging during natural gas processing was held outside the levy of oil cess and allied duties because it is not crude oil within the scope of the charging provision under Section 15 of the Oil Industry (Development) Act, 1974. The Tribunal followed its earlier ruling in the assessee&#039;s own case and treated the by-product as not covered by implication. It also accepted the limitation objection, noting that the demand was raised without invocation of the extended period and was therefore time barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>