https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382785 The appellant, a medicaments manufacturer, faced a recovery proposal for wrongly availed credit. Despite a granted restoration, the appellant continuously delayed proceedings, leading to dismissal for non-prosecution due to lack of diligence and repeated adjournment requests. The Tribunal emphasized the need for active engagement in legal proceedings and dismissed the appeal, highlighting the importance of diligently pursuing one's case for a fair resolution. en-us Fri, 10 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Jul 2019 06:12:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382785 The appellant, a medicaments manufacturer, faced a recovery proposal for wrongly availed credit. Despite a granted restoration, the appellant continuously delayed proceedings, leading to dismissal for non-prosecution due to lack of diligence and repeated adjournment requests. The Tribunal emphasized the need for active engagement in legal proceedings and dismissed the appeal, highlighting the importance of diligently pursuing one's case for a fair resolution. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 10 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382785