https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382780 The Supreme Court permitted the petitioners to file a review petition within a specified timeframe, leading to the disposal of the delay condonation application. The court interpreted provisions under the Madhya Pradesh VAT Act, 2002 and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, specifically addressing the application of Section 14 of the 1956 Act to Entry 30 of Schedule II of the VAT Act. The court rejected contentions against the application of Section 14, emphasizing its applicability to the entire Entry 30. Consequently, the petition was dismissed without costs. en-us Wed, 03 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Jul 2019 06:02:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382780 The Supreme Court permitted the petitioners to file a review petition within a specified timeframe, leading to the disposal of the delay condonation application. The court interpreted provisions under the Madhya Pradesh VAT Act, 2002 and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, specifically addressing the application of Section 14 of the 1956 Act to Entry 30 of Schedule II of the VAT Act. The court rejected contentions against the application of Section 14, emphasizing its applicability to the entire Entry 30. Consequently, the petition was dismissed without costs. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 03 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382780