<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1728 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281883</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, remanding the case back to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision with reasoned orders. The Tribunal emphasized verifying the actual use of properties to determine if they qualify as residential or business assets, particularly focusing on the eligibility of the assessee for deduction under Section 54F and the taxability of notional rent under Section 23.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2019 05:49:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1728 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281883</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, remanding the case back to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision with reasoned orders. The Tribunal emphasized verifying the actual use of properties to determine if they qualify as residential or business assets, particularly focusing on the eligibility of the assessee for deduction under Section 54F and the taxability of notional rent under Section 23.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>