<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1310 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281888</link>
    <description>Section 84 of the Bihar Reorganization Act preserved the statutory force of laws and territorial references in the parent State, so the First Register prepared under the Pharmacy Act for Bihar continued to operate for the territories forming Jharkhand and no fresh First Register was required. After the Education Regulations came into force under the Pharmacy Act, subsequent entries in the pharmacists register had to satisfy those regulations under Section 32(2); the temporary qualifications for preparation of the First Register could not govern later registrations. Persons lacking the prescribed educational qualifications were therefore not entitled to be entered in the register for subsequent registration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2019 05:49:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1310 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281888</link>
      <description>Section 84 of the Bihar Reorganization Act preserved the statutory force of laws and territorial references in the parent State, so the First Register prepared under the Pharmacy Act for Bihar continued to operate for the territories forming Jharkhand and no fresh First Register was required. After the Education Regulations came into force under the Pharmacy Act, subsequent entries in the pharmacists register had to satisfy those regulations under Section 32(2); the temporary qualifications for preparation of the First Register could not govern later registrations. Persons lacking the prescribed educational qualifications were therefore not entitled to be entered in the register for subsequent registration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>