<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 473 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382777</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act. The Court emphasized that the Assessing Officer must express dissatisfaction with the assessee&#039;s claim before applying Rule 8D, which was not done in this case. The appeal did not raise a substantial question of law, leading to the affirmation of the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2019 10:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 473 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382777</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act. The Court emphasized that the Assessing Officer must express dissatisfaction with the assessee&#039;s claim before applying Rule 8D, which was not done in this case. The appeal did not raise a substantial question of law, leading to the affirmation of the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382777</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>